Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update OCI charter to deal with project structure issue #2

Open
caniszczyk opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Update OCI charter to deal with project structure issue #2

caniszczyk opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@caniszczyk
Copy link
Contributor

See this thread:
https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/tob/1pgiEffnu0M

@caniszczyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@opencontainers/tdc-maintainers it would be great to get any proposed solutions to this issue from the TDC. I believe the original intention was to have 1 TDC maintainer list and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple OCI projects with their respective TDC maintainers. We can move forward by updating the charter to reflect that including deciding whether each project should a) their own list of maintainers, or b) one list of maintainers across all OCI projects. We can modify the charter if need be to accommodate option a) if that is what is preferred, but b) is supported by default right now.

@philips
Copy link
Contributor

philips commented Mar 3, 2016

Agree on clarifying the governance to make option B clear (status quo)

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Mar 3, 2016

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:34:26AM -0800, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:

I believe the original intention was to have 1 TDC maintainer list
and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple OCI projects with
their respective TDC maintainers.

That's what the draft charter looked like, but the adopted charter
moved somewhat towards multiple TDCs. The public discussion around
that shift is in [1,2] if folks want some background reading.

 Subject: Contribute to OCI
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:20:04 +0800
 Message-ID: <CAHKD89TqBQvbcdvwt-g3J--sDyq=P50qi6CytokNJznVsei7YQ@mail.gmail.com>

@diogomonica
Copy link

"1 TDC maintainer list and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple OCI projects with their respective TDC maintainers." seems like the right thing, but I'm still not sold on the need for a separate project when what we've been discussing here (distributable format) is already on the roadmap for the current project.

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Mar 3, 2016

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:04:08AM -0800, Diogo Mónica wrote:

"1 TDC maintainer list and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple
OCI projects with their respective TDC maintainers." seems like the
right thing.

The initial push for multiple TDCs was so there could be a distinction
between runC maintainers and spec maintainers 1. As long as:

  • the membership, rules, and contact information of each set (TOB
    electors, TDC(s), project maintainers, …) is clear, and
  • specification/testing projects are governed independently of a
    particular implementation.

I'll be happy.

 Subject: Re: Contribute to OCI
 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:43:17 -0700
 Message-ID: <[email protected]>

wking added a commit to wking/oci-project-template that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2016
Catching up with opencontainers/tob@729e1ecf (Merge pull request opencontainers#18
from RobDolinMS/master, 2016-09-18).  I'd rather drop the
parenthetical entirely and link to a place that listed OCI Projects,
but we don't have a canonical target for that yet
(opencontainers/tob#2) and the current closest instance seems to be
the GitHub section in [1] (which doesn't have the "OCI Project"
words).

[1]: https://www.opencontainers.org/community

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
wking added a commit to wking/oci-project-template that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2017
Catching up with opencontainers/tob@ce087c84 9Merge pull request opencontainers#22
from opencontainers/digest-proposal, 2017-01-05).  I'd still rather
drop the parenthetical entirely and link to a place that listed OCI
Projects, but we don't have a canonical target for that yet
(opencontainers/tob#2) and the current closest instance seems to be
the GitHub section in [1] (which doesn't have the "OCI Project"
words).

[1]: https://www.opencontainers.org/community

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
wking added a commit to wking/oci-project-template that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2017
Catching up with opencontainers/tob@0057edc (Merge pull request opencontainers#29
from opencontainers/selinux-project, 2017-02-23) and the subsequent
rename [1].

I'd still rather drop the parenthetical entirely and link to a place
that listed OCI Projects, but we don't have a canonical target for
that yet (opencontainers/tob#2) and the current closest instance seems
to be the GitHub section in [2] (which doesn't have the "OCI Project"
words).

[1]: opencontainers/selinux#6 (comment)
[2]: https://www.opencontainers.org/community

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
wking added a commit to wking/oci-project-template that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2018
Catching up with [1].

Also mention the new project in GOVERNANCE.md.  I'd still rather drop
the parenthetical entirely and link to a place that listed OCI
Projects, but we don't have a canonical target for that yet
(opencontainers/tob#2) and the current closest instance seems to be
the GitHub section in [2] (which doesn't have the "OCI Project"
words).

[1]: opencontainers/tob#35
[2]: https://www.opencontainers.org/community

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants