-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Getting binaries for multibuild is broken? #1472
Comments
I think the root cause is my attempt to make working with multibuild packages consistent. When working with a remote packages, you can specify Example commands using the testing container that osc uses for running behave tests:
which is consistent with
|
@dmach well this makes sense. A bit. 😉 But I am still not sure why we then have that |
The
Let me check if I can improve the help message. |
Describe the bug
Hi!
I am not sure if this is just me or
osc
is a bit broken? So I use osc Version 1.5.1 from here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Tools/oscAnd then I get this defined argparser's error: e37e144
...if I try this syntax:
https://github.com/dmach/osc/blob/behave/behave/features/getbinaries-project-package-repo-arch.feature#L21
Example (actual names are mangled):
my_stuff
packagecd
there (.osc
is there, current dir is not a project, OK)osc getbinaries some:my:project my_stuff some_repo aarch64 --multibuild-package=my_flavour
Then I get this:
It is already a bug, or just me?
Versions
I am also not entirely sure how this code is conforming to the new syntax:
So if current directory is not a project directory, then amount of args should be no more than two. But in this case
osc
cries that I need to specify a) repo and b) arch. Further experimentations, if I comment-out this error entirely in the code, thenosc
cannot even find a package. But if I omit the package name from the above command, then it downloading me all possible binaries, including the package I am looking for. 😉So I am not sure... If this is just me, then a bit better CLI doc would help. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: