Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 14, 2021. It is now read-only.

Question about the "Contracting process timeline" check #25

Closed
romifz opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Question about the "Contracting process timeline" check #25

romifz opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@romifz
Copy link

romifz commented Jan 21, 2020

The description text for the "Contracting process timeline" compiled release check includes the following:

Also, each award's date and each contract's dateSigned aren't after the release date.

Does this takes into account the award or contract status? If a contract has a dateSigned ahead of the release date, but the contract is in the pending status, should the date discrepancy be allowed?

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

@romifz I think the semantics of dateSigned is that it must be the actual date of signature. We don't want fields to change semantics based on status fields, if possible (there are some exceptions that we want to remove in future versions of OCDS: open-contracting/standard#914)

@romifz
Copy link
Author

romifz commented Jan 21, 2020

Thanks @jpmckinney, makes sense.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants