You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
KirillovDenis opened this issue
Jun 6, 2022
· 2 comments
Labels
blockedCan't be done because of somethingconfigConfiguration format update or breaking changeI3Minimal impactS3Minimally significanttree-serviceImplementing tree-service featuresU4Nothing urgent
Currently, the tree service in node listens the same port as the object service so we can drop the tree.service config param.
But we have to think about something like a pool for tree-service clients in s3. To start we can use the first node endpoint from the peers config section
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I expect that tree-service will be a part of NeoFS API one day, then it will be a part of the SDK Client and SDK Pool, so the issue will be solved. Until then, I think manual tree service endpoint specification is better than having random picking from the list of pool endpoints.
blockedCan't be done because of somethingconfigConfiguration format update or breaking changeI3Minimal impactS3Minimally significanttree-serviceImplementing tree-service featuresU4Nothing urgent
Currently, the
tree
service in node listens the same port as theobject
service so we can drop thetree.service
config param.But we have to think about something like a pool for
tree-service
clients in s3. To start we can use the first node endpoint from thepeers
config sectionThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: