Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support encryption #193

Open
KirillovDenis opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Support encryption #193

KirillovDenis opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
discussion Open discussion of some problem I2 Regular impact S4 Routine U4 Nothing urgent

Comments

@KirillovDenis
Copy link
Contributor

KirillovDenis commented Aug 5, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Should s3-gw support encryption?
@realloc
Copy link

realloc commented Aug 11, 2021

Yes, but we need to figure out the details. I doubt it could work properly in public network, so we could start with some private|local key management services integration. Let's wait a little to survey the possible use cases.

@alexvanin
Copy link
Contributor

As for public networks, encryption should be done completely on client side, before object upload.

@alexvanin
Copy link
Contributor

Consider having KMS service and binding it with S3 Gateway.

@alexvanin alexvanin mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2022
Closed
@roman-khimov roman-khimov added U4 Nothing urgent S4 Routine I2 Regular impact and removed triage question Further information is requested labels Dec 20, 2023
@roman-khimov roman-khimov mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussion Open discussion of some problem I2 Regular impact S4 Routine U4 Nothing urgent
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@realloc @alexvanin @KirillovDenis @roman-khimov @masterSplinter01