You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey guys! I was looking around and found your Port Control Protocol implementation. See, I'd really like to use it, and I think I can via the iroh-net crate, but I really only want the port mapper functionality.
Would you consider extracting your PCP implementation as a separate crate? I think, for the most flexibility, this part of the dependency tree should look somewhat like this: iroh-net -> portmapper -> pcp - where each of these is a separate crate, and the arrow is a dependency relation, where the crate on the left of the arrow depends on the crate on the right of the arrow.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hey guys! I was looking around and found your Port Control Protocol implementation. See, I'd really like to use it, and I think I can via the
iroh-net
crate, but I really only want the port mapper functionality.Would you consider extracting your PCP implementation as a separate crate? I think, for the most flexibility, this part of the dependency tree should look somewhat like this:
iroh-net
->portmapper
->pcp
- where each of these is a separate crate, and the arrow is a dependency relation, where the crate on the left of the arrow depends on the crate on the right of the arrow.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions