Data redundancy demo? #1434
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
kinda. Iroh anchors will be backing up content they discover, but that's not really what you're talking about. The main problem replication management introduces is an additional consensus layer. Maybe we just use another document to manage replication? Lots of additional inspiration to draw from here in addition to Tahoe-LAFS:
Do you have a need for this @Winterhuman? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Noteworthy projects, protocols, and papers (will update this comment over time): Alpha Entanglement CodesAn "essentially" XOR-based error correction algorithm said to be even more fault tolerant than the Reed-Soloman algorithm, with a good range of customisibility in terms of the performance-disk_space-fault_tolerance trade-off. The first mention of this algorithm I had found came from Wondertan/go-ipfs-recovery#4, but https://github.com/dedis/student_22_ipfs_alpha_entanglement_code seems more relevant given its connection to IPFS-Cluster (and it also mentions another project using the algorithm; Snarl). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thinking in terms of existing technology like RAID, or perhaps a more accurate comparison like Tahoe-LAFS, are there any plans for demonstrating redundant data replication across Iroh nodes, taking advantage of similar systems that the
documents
feature uses (mainly the PubSub stuff)?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions