Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 8, 2020. It is now read-only.

An in-range update of yeoman-assert is breaking the build 🚨 #528

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Sep 24, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

An in-range update of yeoman-assert is breaking the build 🚨 #528

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Sep 24, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented Sep 24, 2017

Version 3.1.0 of yeoman-assert just got published.

Branch Build failing 🚨
Dependency yeoman-assert
Current Version 3.0.0
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As yeoman-assert is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪

Status Details
  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build failed Details
  • coverage/coveralls First build on greenkeeper/yeoman-assert-3.1.0 at 97.861% Details

Release Notes v3.1.0
  • New assertion method assert.equalsFileContent() to asserts against exact file content.
Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits.

See the full diff

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Sep 24, 2017

After pinning to 3.0.0 your tests are passing again. Downgrade this dependency 📌.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 25, 2018

Version 3.1.1 just got published.

Your tests are passing again with this version. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 2 commits.

See the full diff

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants