You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Feedback from the W3C Web-Advertising Business Group and Privacy Interest Group and from the browser and privacy research communities highlighted weaknesses in that design. The ability to associate an advertiser's interest group assignment with a person's first-party identity on a publisher's site was considered too high of a privacy leak even with that Explainer's proposed mitigations. Additionally, analysis of real-world userlist memberships indicated that even the proposed "small amount of interest group information" would consume too much of a page's Privacy Budget.
In particular, TURTLEDOVE has two key privacy goals that PIGIN doesn't fulfil:
Advertisers cannot learn the browsing habits of any specific people, even ones who have joined multiple interest groups.
Web sites cannot learn the interest groups of any specific people who visit them.
PIGIN is far less complex and solves many more of the use-cases for online advertising than TURTLEDOVE.
Can you provide details on why PIGIN was withdrawn?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: