Replies: 1 comment
-
Master CSS has its own JIT engine with optimized parsing algorithm, and it has no external dependency. By contrast, Tailwind is more heavy than Master CSS because it is built on the top of PostCSS. As far as I know, Tailwind has improved its JIT engine, and now it is even faster than WindiCSS. But it is still slower than other solutions like Master CSS because runtime parsing is not what it focused on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, I'm a user of TailwindCSS and I have found just this fantastic alternative: Master CSS
Performance is always my main concern. As far as I know, the JIT engine of TailwindCSS is ~355kB (no compression) and it is too heavy to be loaded for every request.
I saw that Master CSS is also using the JIT engine? Is it using the same technique as TailwindCSS does? Would it slow or affect the performance of a large project?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions