-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml #137
Labels
Comments
bjorn
changed the title
Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml
Consider switching from Feb 2, 2022
xml-rs
to quick-xml
bjorn
changed the title
Consider switching from
Consider switching from xml-rs to quick-xml
Feb 2, 2022
xml-rs
to quick-xml
Open
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
According to its own documentation,
quick-xml
can be 50 times faster thanxml-rs
. Of course,xml-rs
might be fast enough for most people, but I think it's worth looking into the required porting effort and doing some measurements.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: