unexpected behavior for dir.clonetree

[JonathanTaquet]

Hi,

when using dir.clonetree('/z/y/x', '/a/b/x', file.copy) the resulting cloned folder is /a/b/x/z/y/x,
and when using dir.clonetree('/z/y/x', '/a/b', file.copy) the resulting cloned folder is /a/b/z/y/x.

Is it intended behavior ?

I would have expected dir.clonetree to act the same as cp -r, i.e. /z/y/x/foo being cloned in /a/b/x/foo in both cases.

Thanks.

[Tieske]

That looks unexpected indeed.