Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ntfy] add priority DOWN field #5221

Open
schwalbe13 opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[ntfy] add priority DOWN field #5221

schwalbe13 opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
feature-request Request for new features to be added

Comments

@schwalbe13
Copy link

πŸ“‘ I have found these related issues/pull requests

no related issues.

🏷️ Feature Request Type

Settings

πŸ”– Feature description

At the moment, I can only define one Priority level for the ntfy notification for when the server is not down (=UP). The DOWN priority has a fixed priority of 5. I want to be able to define a priority type for DOWN as well. Not all DOWN alerts should be sent with the maximum priority.

When I put my phone in "Do Not Disturb" mode, I don't want to be notified when a less important server is DOWN.

βœ”οΈ Solution

  1. Include an extra field with the name "Priority DOWN"
  2. Rename the existing field to "Priority UP"
    image

❓ Alternatives

Using the MQTT notification and modify the alert with python, before sending it to ntfy.

πŸ“ Additional Context

No response

@schwalbe13 schwalbe13 added the feature-request Request for new features to be added label Oct 19, 2024
@Roshanchenna
Copy link

/assign

@CommanderStorm
Copy link
Collaborator

We don't assign people (unnessesary bureaucracy), but feel free to work on this.
What is important is that you include screenshots of all relevant notification types to ensure that there is not some subtle bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request Request for new features to be added
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants