You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The initvals in initial_point for participant offsets are all very close to 0 even if the sigma for the corresponding distribution is high. Shouldn't they be initialized according to the distribution implied by the inits of mu and sigma?
HSSM version
What is the version of HSSM you are using?
then look at initial_point() one can see the sigma is set with initval 3 as desired but the participant offsets are very small and are insensitive to changes in sigma
This discussion was converted from issue #535 on August 22, 2024 15:28.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Describe the bug
The initvals in initial_point for participant offsets are all very close to 0 even if the sigma for the corresponding distribution is high. Shouldn't they be initialized according to the distribution implied by the inits of mu and sigma?
HSSM version
What is the version of HSSM you are using?
0.2.3 but also development
To Reproduce
in model specification:
"formula": "v ~ 1 + (1|participant_id)"
"prior": {
"Intercept": {"name": "Normal", "mu": 1, "sigma": 2, "initval": 1},
"1|participant_id": {"name": "Normal",
"mu": 0, #
"sigma": {"name": "HalfNormal",
"sigma": 5,
"initval": 3}
{
then look at initial_point() one can see the sigma is set with initval 3 as desired but the participant offsets are very small and are insensitive to changes in sigma
Screenshots
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions