You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the notebook Course 1 - Part 6 - Lesson 2 - Notebook the accuracy of a feed forward is being compared to a CNN with a claim that the train accuracy went from 89% to 93% and the test accuracy 87% to 91%.
However, this appears to be an apple to oranges comparison as the number of trainable parameters in the CNN model is more than twice that in the feed forward.
Ideally two models with same depth and same number of trainable parameters ought to be compared.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the notebook Course 1 - Part 6 - Lesson 2 - Notebook the accuracy of a feed forward is being compared to a CNN with a claim that the train accuracy went from 89% to 93% and the test accuracy 87% to 91%.
However, this appears to be an apple to oranges comparison as the number of trainable parameters in the CNN model is more than twice that in the feed forward.
Ideally two models with same depth and same number of trainable parameters ought to be compared.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: