We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Call it something else? Not sure what. This with Peter Campbell's comment in LAMPS 120 chat.
Sophie suggested ECIES -- but I don't think that's quite right either since we are not doing the symmetric encryption + MAC step.
Personally, I think we should leave it as "DHKEM" -- I don't think 9180 should have a monopoly on this term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Call it something else?
Not sure what.
This with Peter Campbell's comment in LAMPS 120 chat.
Sophie suggested ECIES -- but I don't think that's quite right either since we are not doing the symmetric encryption + MAC step.
Personally, I think we should leave it as "DHKEM" -- I don't think 9180 should have a monopoly on this term.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: