-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problems with the new import configuration #5219
Comments
When the But I see now that having the option to add custom URL parameters is not only useful but even required in some cases, so I think we should try to re-enable this option. |
The query delimiter is an optional character in which the query part of the URL can be enclosed. This was necessary for some SRU interfaces like the "LfULG - DiGAS" where the query would need to be enclosed in In the |
Yes, the mapping files are saved in a list internally, preserving the order in which they have been assigned to the import configuration and ensuring they are applied in the correct order to the imported metadata file. In fact, an exception will be thrown if you try to save a an ImportConfiguration where
|
You are right, I missed this feature when implementing the new |
Thank you for your prompt replies. My question about the order of the mapping files came from my test with the SRU interface of the zdb: In the xml-based configuration i specified two mapping files:
XML config: This worked. I cannot make it work with the new configuration. The url is constructed correctly but at some point a parser exception is thrown I therefor assume that something is not working correctly with the mappings. |
I checked again and the problem seems to have to do with the missing ordering of the entries in the database table I changed the following by hand in to: so that the MARC converter comes first. Now everything works. By doing that the order of the entries in We probably need an "order"-column in |
@solth Another question: What is the purpose of the xpath configuration for the parent?: I had the assumption that the definition, which element in the returned xml form the catalague is the parent element's identifier is controlled by the definition in the ruleset. (By setting the What is the specific purpose of giving an XPath to the parent element here? Is this used in a different context than the |
The The metadata configured as |
I have some problems transferring the current xml based configuration to the new import configuration (#5038). Right now i cannot make some catalogs work which worked before. It seems that some of the features got lost which originally ( #3374) allowed for the usage of arbitrary search interfaces. It would be good if those features could be ported to the new interface as well to make use of catalogs which worked before
I have some questions in this context:
<identifierParameter prefix="prefix:" value="id" />
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: