-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zpk2tf, tf2zpk representation #191
Comments
Hello, If an external solution is appropriate, python's scipy.signal.tf2zpk is compatible by all means with KFR and can be used to transform from tf to zpk representation. Or do you need a builtin function to do this at runtime? Internal functions are absolutely ok for using in your code but may be changed/removed in future versions without any prior notice (not part of stable API). |
Right, indeed I need builtin. I am using C++ language in my programs. |
GSL is GPL-licensed and not compatible with a dual-licensed KFR. You can perfectly use GSL together with the KFR in your GPL-licensed project but pull request cannot be merged if the changes contains or depends on GPL-only code because of our commercial clients. All code that is contained in KFR repository must be allowed to be used/linked with closed-source proprietary software. |
yes I definitely don't know whether kfr is able to solve polynomials, but this was the main limitation in my case. |
Hello,
I would be interested in using tf representation for a filter that I designed.
Is there any existing interface to turn tf coefficients into zpk representation and opposite ?
It seems I am not the only one in need. #148
I have found a zpk2tf method but it is marked as internal. This tf2zpk would be great feature to implement.
Could you advice on this ? @dancazarin
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: