-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rationale for using buildSrc
instead of Composite Builds
#117
Comments
buildSrc
instead of Composite Builds
buildSrc
instead of Composite Builds
While I'm not John, my 2 cents: People at Apollo have come up with a work-around, that still has some drawbacks, like IDE Sync being slow as it rebuilds from scratch every time. My advise, as someone using composite builds and KMM is: avoid this combination if you can. This should be improved in the future, but it's not stable for now. |
PeopleInSpace uses Build Sources (
buildSrc
).Is there a reason why Composite Builds is not used instead?
As I was checking how PeopleInSpace manages versioning, I saw this PR #116 and it prompted me to look into buildSrc and Composite Build.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: