Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add KI203M version: 0042 + 0050 #37

Open
Brutosss opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 16 comments
Open

Add KI203M version: 0042 + 0050 #37

Brutosss opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 16 comments

Comments

@Brutosss
Copy link

Brutosss commented Mar 5, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@Feezex
Copy link
Contributor

Feezex commented Mar 5, 2024

Provide a software number, diagnostic identification results etc.

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

Brutosss commented Mar 5, 2024

KI203M_0042 = KI209_1042 ?

@Feezex
Copy link
Contributor

Feezex commented Mar 5, 2024

No, get info from das or vediamo

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

Brutosss commented Mar 5, 2024

KI203M_0042
SW 26 07
HW 31 07
A203 540 69 48
AJ08_1
0.0.84
&
KI203M_0050
SW 17 08
HW 34 08
A203 540 85 48
AJ09_1
0.0.84

I hope it's enough!

@Feezex
Copy link
Contributor

Feezex commented Mar 5, 2024

ok try to use the most close sw version
as far as i remember - it works like that - pre version is KI203M_0031 so up to 43 it must be same algo.
31 - 42 , 43 is a next one

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

Brutosss commented Mar 5, 2024

Thank you very much for the clarification, I'll try it and confirm later!

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

Brutosss commented Mar 9, 2024

ok try to use the most close sw version as far as i remember - it works like that - pre version is KI203M_0031 so up to 43 it must be same algo. 31 - 42 , 43 is a next one

I tried the previous version 31 and the one after 43 and nothing sparked, it was always on the second level, if you can help in any way to find the solution, please let me know!

@Feezex
Copy link
Contributor

Feezex commented Mar 10, 2024

With vediamo you need to create vnd(manual commands input commands list), and need to pass a routine quickly up to security level. For ki203m :

  1. 10 92
  2. 10 86
  3. 21 09
  4. 21 60
  5. 10 F0
  6. 31 FB 00
  7. 31 FB 11
  8. 31 FB 10
    Here you will get seed, and answer with 31 FA 10 + key. This will unlock memory read/write.
    after key acepted you must get answer 71 FA.
    31 FB 11 now must response with 71 FB 07 << means level 07 is the actual (and highest)

Im not sure the timer between each commands up to step 8, can be equal of 2-3s.

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

(I already did it with version 0043 and the first time I got level 07, but I used 27 01 and 27 02 and just asked for the level before and after the SEED/KEY)

in this version 0042 when asking for the level at the end despite giving up to 71 FA then the level remained at 02!

But I'm going to try the routine in a more accurate way ;-)

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

I leave it to your appreciation if it helps! tested with version 0031 and 0043 and nothing worked!

0275

@Feezex
Copy link
Contributor

Feezex commented Mar 11, 2024

Lool why your answer is same as seed? Make a same screens for v31 and v 43

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

command 10 86 always fails!

despite answering 71 FA the level remains at 02 and does not allow changes to be made!
0031 - 11 03 2024
0043 - 11 03 2024

@Feezex
Copy link
Contributor

Feezex commented Mar 11, 2024

Seems perfect, have you tried to read ee?

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

ee? but it remains in version 02!

same in both versions
0031 - 11 03 2024 2

@Feezex
Copy link
Contributor

Feezex commented Mar 11, 2024

But 71 fa means its been accepted

@Brutosss
Copy link
Author

Brutosss commented Mar 11, 2024

but as soon as the level is the same (02) it doesn't allow any of the forms to be written...

It seems that the codes are valid, but not for this case in this version and therefore the level transition does not occur!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants