Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Saving posterior probabilities for clustering procedures #2959

Open
DJoubert1971 opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@DJoubert1971
Copy link

Description

It would be useful to be able to save posterior probabilities for all cluster solutions, since they are often more precise than cluster assignment

Purpose

Precision

Use-case

No response

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Feature is missing from the modules

Is your feature request related to a JASP module?

Machine Learning

Describe the solution you would like

Make saving posterior probabilities for the clusters available

Describe alternatives that you have considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@tomtomme
Copy link
Member

@DJoubert1971
thx for the request

@koenderks
is this feasible?

@koenderks
Copy link

@DJoubert1971 Which algorithms currently implemented in JASP provide such posterior probabilities? I think that not all clustering algorithms give a probabilistic outcome?

@tomtomme tomtomme added the Waiting for requester If waiting for a long time it is reasonable to close an issue label Oct 14, 2024
@DJoubert1971
Copy link
Author

DJoubert1971 commented Oct 14, 2024 via email

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Waiting for requester If waiting for a long time it is reasonable to close an issue label Oct 14, 2024
@koenderks
Copy link

It's easiest if the packages themselves return a matrix of probabilities.

randomForest (for random foresT)
mclust (for model-based)
cluster (for k-means etc.)
stats (for hiearchical)
e1071 (for fuzzy c means)
dbscan (for density-based)

@DJoubert1971
Copy link
Author

DJoubert1971 commented Oct 15, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants