I think the README version looks pretty nice (primarily because "website: doesn't take up so much column width).

https://github.com/fly/Hackathon-Calendar/blob/e8783eff2e1c38ffe3d8ce3d749055d362f68d32/hackathons.csv

Maybe just keep both versions? With a Makefile that updates the README when the csv is changed? Or maybe that's overkill...idk.

I'd like to keep the README (markdown), but I'm fine with having both versions.

I'd like to have a csv so I can sort by date and stuff

the readme sorting is confusing

Perhaps a makefile to generate the CSV version automatically? Shouldn't be too hard since everything is very strictly formatted.

cat README.md | sed 's/^| \[\(.*\)\](\(.*\)) | \(.*\) | \(.*\) |/\1,\2,\3,\4/'

that's pretty slick, but what would make the csv? a travis-ci worker that would also push to the repo?

Travis ci would be pretty neat, it shouldn't be too hard since it just needs to run make and then commit the two files generated. Or, when pull requests are made, the requester can run make and commit the fresh csv files.

I like the travis ci idea since it's hard to get every contributor to take an extra step before committing. Also removes any issues with different versions of sed or make.