-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to use this for real (programming) regexes? #3
Comments
@AJMansfield care to explain what you're having problems with? |
AJMansfield
changed the title
Option for using this with real
How to use this with programming-dialext regexes?
Mar 22, 2014
AJMansfield
changed the title
How to use this with programming-dialext regexes?
How to use this with programming regexes?
Mar 22, 2014
AJMansfield
changed the title
How to use this with programming regexes?
How to use this for real (programming) regexes?
Mar 22, 2014
I think he was most likely expecting the Perl Compatible Regular Expressions language set, but your usage of "Kleene operator" suggests a different set. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The language that this library parses uses a different set of symbols as the operators than the type commonly used by regex libraries in most programming languages: using
+
instead of|
for alternation, and no+
(one or more),{n}
(exactly n copies),?
(optional), or other operators (although they can all be expanded into expressions involving only the alternation and kleene operators). How can I use this library with the more common regex dialect instead?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: