-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Accuracy #183
Comments
Should be the last one, which is for the last epoch. Loss should drop with
each Epoch.
Epoch 10/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 97s 16ms/step - *loss: 0.4018*
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - *val_loss: 0.3772 *-
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Darin Plutchok
206-909-3665
…On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:11 PM padirmiray ***@***.***> wrote:
Which one is the accuracy in this case?
Epoch 1/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 110s 18ms/step - loss: 0.6284
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.5469 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 2/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 114s 19ms/step - loss: 0.5469
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4550 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 3/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 110s 18ms/step - loss: 0.5045
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4333 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 4/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 107s 18ms/step - loss: 0.4745
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4245 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 5/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 106s 17ms/step - loss: 0.4585
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4172 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 6/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 106s 17ms/step - loss: 0.4399
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4251 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 7/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 100s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4234
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3898 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 8/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 96s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4135
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3928 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 9/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 96s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4055
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3844 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 10/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 97s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4018
- top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3772 -
val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#183>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADCufz3uWVdgY8WQSvVdyOWvyZTm11Ixks5vhiBhgaJpZM4czgzG>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Which one is the accuracy in this case?
Epoch 1/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 110s 18ms/step - loss: 0.6284 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.5469 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 2/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 114s 19ms/step - loss: 0.5469 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4550 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 3/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 110s 18ms/step - loss: 0.5045 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4333 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 4/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 107s 18ms/step - loss: 0.4745 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4245 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 5/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 106s 17ms/step - loss: 0.4585 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4172 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 6/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 106s 17ms/step - loss: 0.4399 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.4251 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 7/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 100s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4234 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3898 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 8/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 96s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4135 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3928 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 9/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 96s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4055 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3844 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
Epoch 10/10
6072/6072 [==============================] - 97s 16ms/step - loss: 0.4018 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000 - val_loss: 0.3772 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 1.0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: