Question about Signer CRDT #179
-
Hey, I'm reading the specs and I saw https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/blob/main/docs/SPECIFICATION.md#312-userdata-crdt |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments
-
Signers moved on chain to the The new equivalent to " |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I see. Thanks for your explaination! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I created a PR #186 to update the spec. I hope this is helpful! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Signers moved on chain to the
KeyRegistry
contract as part of FIP-7. You're right, there are still some references to the old CRDT in the spec doc.The new equivalent to "
m.signer
must be a valid Signer in the add-set of the Signer CRDT formessage.fid
" is "m.signer
must be a valid key withKeystate.ADDED
in theKeyRegistry
contract formessage.fid
."