question about formula (2) and (5)

[chenhch8]

Hi @fanyangxyz ,

I am confused why formula (2) can be converted into to formula (5). It seems like these two formulae are not equivalent and there is no explanation in paper. Would you mind tell me more details about this?

[fanyangxyz]

We are not intended to say that Eq (2) and Eq (5) are equivalent, but that rules parameterized using Eq (5) (or (6)-(8)) can be converted back to Eq (2), which is essentially what Algorithm 1 is about. Hope this helps.

[chenhch8]

Thank you for your reply!
I have another question. I tried to recover the experimental results on KG completion on the WN18 dataset, but the best hit @10 is 84.7, which is much smaller than the 94.5 shown in your paper. I also changed some parameters, but it just improved a bit. Do you mind telling me its parameter settings?

[fanyangxyz]

Did you use the evaluation steps in the README? My guess is that your number is not the filtered hit@10.