Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Express TC Meeting 01-09-2019 #73

Closed
dougwilson opened this issue Dec 18, 2018 · 13 comments
Closed

Express TC Meeting 01-09-2019 #73

dougwilson opened this issue Dec 18, 2018 · 13 comments
Labels

Comments

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

dougwilson commented Dec 18, 2018

Who

The entire community is welcome to tune in and observe the meeting live at the time below. The following people are listed here as explicit invitees to get an email notification about the upcoming meeting:

Invited:

When

Jan 9, 2019 - 23:30 UTC

Where

YouTube Live

Agenda

Propose other agenda topics which can be added to this list.

@wesleytodd
Copy link
Member

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does #70 need discussion from the TC? It seems like just a request to document the strategy rather than there being any discussion / decision making involved. The TC meeting wouldn't likely be a live writing of docs, though if it's to force someone to volunteer to write the docs, then I suppose that is something. Can you clarify on that suggestion @wesleytodd ?

@wesleytodd
Copy link
Member

I agree it does not need "discussion", I was actually hoping that a documentation request could be turned into an "owner" who would write said docs, like you said to "force someone to volunteer" :)

I really only added it here because no one stepped up on the issue.

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gotcha. Yea, I think the request is valid, and I'm happy to do it if no one else picks it up, though I have so much in queue right now that is likely must more important :) especially just coming back from a break (and will be gone soon for the holidays). I'm not sure that the TC ultimately has the authority to force someone to take a given task, unfortunately, though if nothing happens by the meeting, we can bring it up again those those in attendance :)

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@niftylettuce I saw your post via email (I guess you deleted it quickly) and I guess you already figured out the answer, but yes, you're a TC member, so should join the participation link when posted that day.

I will likely need to test the YouTube recording mechanism sometime between now and then, so if I need someone to help be a participant, I'll post a new issue and schedule a time with someone to assist.

@niftylettuce
Copy link

Sounds good @dougwilson 😄

@XVincentX
Copy link

Discuss Express 5.0

Oh man finally — I want to see this so badly!

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

LinusU commented Jan 9, 2019

Very sad to say that I won’t be able to make it to this meeting 😭

Sorry for letting you know so late, I had mistaken the date by a day in my calendar 🤦‍♂️

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @LinusU sorry to hear that. There will be another scheduled after this one, though, so don't worry. When the meetings were regular, they were every other week. Before this meeting is over, we will discuss when the next one will be, as they are just ramping up, so we'll see what may be left on the agenda, etc. to decide if two weeks is good or too soon 👍

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

LinusU commented Jan 11, 2019

Listening to the meeting now ☺️

Thanks for talking about the Standard style transition documentation, @wesleytodd what you said was spot on what I was thinking! Sorry I couldn't be there in person

@wesleytodd
Copy link
Member

Awesome, I assume you are also alright with this kind of documentation being on the website?

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

LinusU commented Jan 11, 2019

Absolutely 👍

@gireeshpunathil
Copy link

meeting happened long back, closing. Please re-open if anything is outstanding here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants