-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transfer the main repo to TinkerSoc organisation #79
Comments
Yeah agreed, but I wouldn't want to move it for a little while, ben and rob On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Simon Cooksey [email protected]
|
Well, we'd still be able to manage it in the organisation - it just keeps things a little better organised. I don't really mind either way, though. |
It's just dealing with upstreams and pull requests is a bit of a dick when On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Simon Cooksey [email protected]
|
ah, I see - fair enough. I'm in no hurry anyway, so whenever is fine :) |
It's no big deal for us to refork from the new group-managed repo. No real hurry but it is probably best long-term. |
It'll mean fiddling about with your remotes in Git, I guess - but it should be okay. It's @egelmex's call, I'll leave it for him. |
Still agree we should do it, but would rather put it off till I have time On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Simon Cooksey [email protected]
|
Sounds good to me 👍 |
Completely forgot about this over Christmas >.> |
Your not the only one... On Mon Jan 05 2015 at 10:13:23 AM Simon Cooksey [email protected]
|
GitHub keeps the old url as a redirect for the new repo; e.g.
post change. It really could be worth making a script to automate building the website locally, and pushing the static content to a GitHub pages branch, as that hosting is free and almost as high capacity (certainly Slashdot/HaD-proof) |
Got details on how to do this? On Mon Jan 05 2015 at 3:53:17 PM Simon Cooksey [email protected]
|
it would just be a case of pushing the contents of We'd also need a Not sure on the git specifics for copying the contents of a folder to a given branch. Should be feasible, though. |
Potentially we could have a Makefile too, so we can do things like
|
Aha, someone has made a rakefile to do it: require "rubygems"
desc "Deploy to Github Pages"
task :deploy do
puts "## Deploying to Github Pages"
puts "## Generating site"
system "grunt build"
cd "_site" do
system "git add -A"
message = "Site updated at #{Time.now.utc}"
puts "## Commiting: #{message}"
system "git commit -m \"#{message}\""
puts "## Pushing generated site"
system "git push"
puts "## Deploy Complete!"
end
end See: http://www.aymerick.com/2014/07/22/jekyll-github-pages-bower-bootstrap.html (at the end) |
I think it would be good to have this repo in the TinkerSoc organisation, and keep personal forks for development. Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: