Replies: 5 comments 5 replies
-
Can you post the SPARQL query and the entire query explanation? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I hope it will fit in a comment :
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
You are 100% on target : |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Created an issue for this: #5134 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is it considered acceptable that an explanation (that did not timeout) resultSizeActual can be (far) bigger than the actual result (without explanation) ?
I don't know if I have to report this kind of inconsistency as an issue.
As an example, I get :
Catalog played. #failed:0 #ok:50 timed out:2
2024-09-18T14:16:05.976824548Z querying 'BPd'...... for explanation ...
Order (resultSizeActual=66.8K, totalTimeActual=483ms, selfTimeActual=194ms)
[...]
explained query took 0s for 66 <- real call following an explain that had not timed out and has a resultSizeActual > 0
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions