-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The code generated from idlj (Helper classes) uses Double-checked locking #12
Comments
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We are using idlj (version 3.2) to generate java files. The Helper classes use Double-checked locking for the type() which can be unsafe.
Our fix right now is to modify the code after idlj has done it's job, would it be possible to have it generate different code?
(Am I even creating a case in the correct project)
Example of the generated code is:
private static org.omg.CORBA.TypeCode __typeCode = null;
private static boolean __active = false;
synchronized public static org.omg.CORBA.TypeCode type ()
{
if (__typeCode == null)
{
synchronized (org.omg.CORBA.TypeCode.class)
{
if (__typeCode == null)
{
if (__active)
{ return org.omg.CORBA.ORB.init().create_recursive_tc ( _id ); }
__active = true;
....
Environment
w7-vs2010-64
IDL-to-Java compiler (portable), version "3.2"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: