Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Django ORM driver #158

Open
programmerq opened this issue Feb 18, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Feature Request: Django ORM driver #158

programmerq opened this issue Feb 18, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@programmerq
Copy link

I would like to use crate with my Django projects.

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@joemoe
Copy link
Contributor

joemoe commented Feb 22, 2016

hi @programmerq, we put this on our backlog, this may take some time, as this isn't our main focus atm.

@benjaminrigaud
Copy link

Few months ago, I started evaluating the complexity of such a task. The work of @mfelsche on the https://github.com/mfelsche/crate-django package is a good start. The Crate JOINs support should be sufficient to develop a complete enough Django database backend.

I really want to spend a few days on it in the coming months.

@jodok
Copy link
Contributor

jodok commented Feb 22, 2016

that's really cool! @benjaminrigaud - we'd be happy to sponsor you if that helps. [email protected]

@mwaaas
Copy link

mwaaas commented Oct 23, 2016

would like to use django and crate too, is this still in the pipeline

I have never contributed to django would like to try to contribute to this issue

@amotl
Copy link
Member

amotl commented Apr 11, 2024

Hi again,

apologies for the super late reply. Regarding Django support, @mfelsche contributed a patch over here, but it never materialized up until now.

Today, we received another request from the community about it. Thanks!

With kind regards,
Andreas.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants