Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation is missing a migration guide from older versions of PocketSphinx #386

Open
francogrex opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@francogrex
Copy link

francogrex commented May 8, 2024

Where are older versions API 4 for example?

@dhdaines
Copy link
Contributor

dhdaines commented May 9, 2024

Hi could you be a bit more specific about what, exactly is doing this referencing of an obsolete pocketsphinx?

Is it some particular piece of documentation?

I can't fix a bug if I don't know what needs to be fixed.

Older versions still live over on SourceForge, if you can tolerate the ads and the slowness.

@francogrex francogrex changed the title References an obsolete pocketsphinx Older versions of pocketsphinx? May 10, 2024
@francogrex
Copy link
Author

hi I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, I changed the title: it's another library that is using older version of Pocketsphinx, referencing constructs that are no longer available in version 5 like for example cmd_ln_int32_r etc...

@dhdaines dhdaines changed the title Older versions of pocketsphinx? Documentation is missing a migration guide from older versions of PocketSphinx May 11, 2024
@dhdaines
Copy link
Contributor

Ah! It is possible, though uncertain, that this is documented somewhere. There is a blog post which mentions the API changes, but there isn't a migration guide, really. I've changed the title of this issue to reflect that!

When I get a chance (but feel free to remind at some point) I can start a page on cmusphinx.github.io with some of the more important changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants