-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Workflow: Update explicit data AND create note for comment #20
Comments
As we intend to help OSM contributors, maybe asking them first for their feedback on this could be useful. I will ask for comments on several French discussion channel, can you do the same for German-speaking communities ? |
Will do, as part of my status update post scheduled for today. |
Some very interesting feedback from one of our top notes-solver in France :
|
About the editable opening hours : caresteouvert/caresteouvert#338 |
Maybe the title of the weekday selection could be more specific: "Choose days that share the same opening hours". Right now it could seem that you have to choose all days on which the place is open. |
That's a good wording! |
Before going further on this (as community discussions doesn't give a formal consensus as now), we can work on limiting details given. The idea is to detect "useless" texts put in details fields, like "open", "closed", "nothing"... I will look in existing feedback in DB to see if we can find some recurring patterns. |
So a first analysis gives these results :
In useful comments, we often find :
So, first easy thing is to make details input field either empty or between 10 and 200 characters. Then, we could add optional input fields for phone number, website. Finally, work on opening hours field to allow more options ? |
Limiting input field size is done : caresteouvert/caresteouvert@2c56d4d |
Summarized feedback from talk-fr mailing list :
|
IMO it would help to update the explicit data (opening_hours, delivery, takeway, drivethrough) automatically, even if a comment was given.
Like this, notes with comments that don't require any changes (like repeating what was already provided, or providing a source), can simply be closed.
Note: This would need to be communicated to the OSM community.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: