We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exploring the display of the leadfield sensitivity with @tmedani, I found some disturbing behaviors that I haven't had time to investigate.
Two use cases:
Then right-click on the MRI Viewer figure > Overlay options > Interpolation sources-MRI > Resolution...
With Resolution: 2 voxels, I observed results for depth EEG stimulation that seem to be off by a few voxels:
With Resolution: 3 voxels, the display is completely off...
These menus change the property InterpDownsample, which is then passed as the input parameter nDownsample to grid_interp_mri.m.
InterpDownsample
nDownsample
grid_interp_mri.m
The interpolation algorithm used there could probably be fixed and optimized (using newer Matlab interpolation options for example)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Exploring the display of the leadfield sensitivity with @tmedani, I found some disturbing behaviors that I haven't had time to investigate.
Two use cases:
Then right-click on the MRI Viewer figure > Overlay options > Interpolation sources-MRI > Resolution...
With Resolution: 2 voxels, I observed results for depth EEG stimulation that seem to be off by a few voxels:
With Resolution: 3 voxels, the display is completely off...
These menus change the property
InterpDownsample
, which is then passed as the input parameternDownsample
togrid_interp_mri.m
.The interpolation algorithm used there could probably be fixed and optimized (using newer Matlab interpolation options for example)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: