You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey folks! I'm a trustee in the San Francisco chapter, and I had a feature request for the application browsing page. When we evaluate grant applications, we always just look at the applications from the last calendar month. It would be super convenient to have a button in this toolbar:
...that was a quick "only show last month's applications" button. From lurking in the global awesome mailing list, I realize that every chapter has their own workflow, so I'm mostly filing this to see if there's interest from people outside the SF chapter; if yes, I'm happy to take a stab at an implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd say that the most generic way of doing this that wouldn't cause problems for people who don't do things a month at a time would be a link somewhere on the page (or a keyboard shortcut!) that would just pre-fill the start and end dates and optionally submit the form. That way we're not cluttering the page up with a different "search" option.
I gotcha - you want a consistent URL where it'll always just show "last month's" applications. That's a neat good idea. I'm not sure the best place to put that, but I would play around with a couple of things - you can just mock them up and we can discuss them in here before submitting a pull request.
Hey folks! I'm a trustee in the San Francisco chapter, and I had a feature request for the application browsing page. When we evaluate grant applications, we always just look at the applications from the last calendar month. It would be super convenient to have a button in this toolbar:
...that was a quick "only show last month's applications" button. From lurking in the global awesome mailing list, I realize that every chapter has their own workflow, so I'm mostly filing this to see if there's interest from people outside the SF chapter; if yes, I'm happy to take a stab at an implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: