-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
APE 22 follow-up: Candidates for pyOpenSci trial review period #571
Labels
Comments
Editors (fixed ;-) – reviewers are anonymous under the Astropy rules, but would need to waive their anonymity in the new system. |
You are correct. Thanks for pointing that out and fixing it! |
Happy to give it a go. |
Thank you @kyleaoman, we will contact the current reviewer for your package to determine the next steps. Summarising some key changes in the process:
|
This was referenced Aug 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This has been discussed offline between me and Astropy Editors but in the spirit of transparency, I am going to create a table in this issue listing the currently active applications. As each of them accept or reject this trial period, we collectively need to update this table.
Trial period is as laid out in Step 1 of https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/main/APE22.rst#implementation and https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs/blob/main/APE22.rst#the-trial-period .
This is a follow up of:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: