You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The documentation suggests agains using abbreviated timezone strings (e.g. EST, UTC, etc.):
timezone names from tz database provided via dateutil package, note that abbreviations such as MST, PDT, BRST are unlikely to parse due to ambiguity. Use the full IANA zone name instead (Asia/Shanghai, Europe/London, America/Chicago etc)
Arrow can successfully parse each of the standard and daylight timezone abbreviations in the United States (except Alaska) and eastern & western Europe (including GMT and UTC): ['CET', 'EDT', 'EET', 'EST', 'GMT', 'HST', 'MET', 'MST', 'UTC', 'WET']
Arrow can and should do better. It exists to improve on datetime and dateutil, why improve on parsing as well?
Timezone abbreviations are not as ambiguous as the documentation claims. It is well defined in the IANA timezone database. Specifically in to2050.tzs (see the IANA timezone database downloadable from the reference link below) which could easily be used to create a mapping from abbreviations to offset.
Additional timezone abbreviations that could be supported (including some historical ones such as war and peace time used in the US during 1942) are:
Issue Description
The documentation suggests agains using abbreviated timezone strings (e.g. EST, UTC, etc.):
timezone names from tz database provided via dateutil package, note that abbreviations such as MST, PDT, BRST are unlikely to parse due to ambiguity. Use the full IANA zone name instead (Asia/Shanghai, Europe/London, America/Chicago etc)
Arrow can successfully parse each of the standard and daylight timezone abbreviations in the United States (except Alaska) and eastern & western Europe (including GMT and UTC): ['CET', 'EDT', 'EET', 'EST', 'GMT', 'HST', 'MET', 'MST', 'UTC', 'WET']
Arrow can and should do better. It exists to improve on datetime and dateutil, why improve on parsing as well?
Timezone abbreviations are not as ambiguous as the documentation claims. It is well defined in the IANA timezone database. Specifically in to2050.tzs (see the IANA timezone database downloadable from the reference link below) which could easily be used to create a mapping from abbreviations to offset.
Additional timezone abbreviations that could be supported (including some historical ones such as war and peace time used in the US during 1942) are:
ACDT, ACST, ADDT, ADT, AEDT, AEST, AHDT, AHST, AKDT, AKST, AMT, APT, AST, AWDT, AWST, AWT, BDST, BDT, BMT, BST, CAST, CAT, CDDT, CDT, CEMT, CEST, CMT, CPT, CST, CWT, ChST, DMT, EAT, EDDT, EEST, EMT, EPT, EWT, FFMT, FMT, GDT, GST, HDT, HKST, HKT, HKWT, HMT, HPT, HWT, IDDT, IDT, IMT, IST, JDT, JMT, JST, KDT, KMT, KST, LMT, LST, MDDT, MDST, MDT, MEST, MMT, MPT, MSD, MSK, MWT, NDDT, NDT, NPT, NST, NWT, NZDT, NZMT, NZST, PDDT, PDT, PKST, PKT, PLMT, PMMT, PMT, PPMT, PPT, PST, PWT, QMT, RMT, SAST, SDMT, SET, SJMT, SMT, SST, TBMT, TMT, WAST, WAT, WEMT, WEST, WIB, WIT, WITA, WMT, YDDT, YDT, YPT, YST, YWT
Reference: https://www.iana.org/time-zones
System Info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: