-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dirq sometimes failing to write temporary messages #64
Comments
tofu-rocketry
changed the title
Dirq failing to write temporary messages
Dirq sometimes failing to write temporary messages
May 10, 2018
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue yesterday, but for next time, could we just do something like this?
(Or more generally a for/while loop, although we would need an extra if statement to check for the last iteration.) |
DanielPerkins7
added a commit
to DanielPerkins7/ssm
that referenced
this issue
Aug 1, 2023
resolve apel#64. i was unsure which part needed to be repeated so i just repeated the whole function until the message can be saved into the queue, im not sure if this is right though.
DanielPerkins7
added a commit
to DanielPerkins7/ssm
that referenced
this issue
Aug 1, 2023
resolve apel#64. i was unsure which part needed to be repeated so i just repeated the whole function until the message can be saved into the queue, im not sure if this is right though.
DanielPerkins7
added a commit
to DanielPerkins7/ssm
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2023
resolve apel#64. i have just repeated the procedure either until it works or until a new counter i introduced reaches 3 so there is a limit to the recursion
DanielPerkins7
added a commit
to DanielPerkins7/ssm
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2023
resolve apel#64 . repeats the procedure either until it works or until it has been repeated three times
DanielPerkins7
added a commit
to DanielPerkins7/ssm
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2023
resolve apel#64 . repeats the procedure either until it works or until it has been repeated three times
DanielPerkins7
added a commit
to DanielPerkins7/ssm
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2023
resolve apel#64. loops the add calls until they work or until the for loop is exhausted. is something like this what you mean?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Following on from #62, while exception handling has been added in #63 for the missing
IOError
, these messages will still be lost, but they will be handled more nicely.dirq
seems to be sometimes failing when writing out accepted messages to thetemporary
directory it uses.This could possibly be solved by retrying when adding the message to the accepted queue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: