Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using automation to update awesome-ansible #86

Open
ssbarnea opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Consider using automation to update awesome-ansible #86

ssbarnea opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member

ssbarnea commented Apr 6, 2023

Take a look at similar awesome listing that uses automation for listing popular and trending items: https://github.com/pawamoy/best-of-mkdocs

Maybe we should make use of the same solution to maintain our listing?

@ssbarnea ssbarnea changed the title Consider using Consider using automation to update awesome-ansible Apr 6, 2023
@KeyboardInterrupt
Copy link
Member

Hi, sorry for the slow response!
Appreciate the suggestion! I'm a big fan of automation, but in this specific instance, automatically gathering and adding everything related to Ansible might not be advantageous for the List. Its primary aim is to be community-driven and maintained, ensuring it remains a resource built by the community for the community.

Still, I like the Idea and dont want to dismiss it right away, and I will take a look at the mentioned repository and see if there is something there!

^C

@KeyboardInterrupt KeyboardInterrupt self-assigned this Nov 20, 2023
@samccann
Copy link

yes I'm inclined to agree. We decided 'somewhere' (sorry lost track) that we should be using this repo instead of adding individual tools to the documentation page. So we want to be sure the tools we have here are valid/worthwhile/maintained etc. Hard to do that with automation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants