-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
proper packaging? #16
Comments
mlat-client having a non-deprecated way to build would be nice. readsb being a deb is an issue unless you make the package / binary name adsb.lol specific. Considering that you'd still build the debs during install, you still have a shell script users need to run. Dealing with debian packaging sounds like work from a maintenance perspective actually. Really making sure this works after lots of changes would be a lot of work.
I get the intent, but i'm doubting the actual benefit. One note, there is this linked in the readme: https://github.com/adsblol/feed?tab=readme-ov-file#manual-feeding-with-readsb-and-mlat-client |
Follow-up of ADSBexchange/feedclient#16 which applies as well to the present
master
branch (which sounds like a fork but started as a copy, isn't?)apt-get
s =Depends
git clone
=.deb
compile readsb
: Should be another.deb
mlat-client
: Should be a pip / pipxDoes it sound desirable from a long-term maintenance perspective?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: