Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding appointment to two clients with the same date and location #11

Open
Wu-Lezheng opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@Wu-Lezheng
Copy link
Owner

Wu-Lezheng commented Nov 11, 2022

image.png

Description

Adding appointment to two clients with the same date and location is not allowed as specified by the UG. However, I think this design has some flaws.

Rationale

It is very possible in real life that two clients (can be friends, or family members) with similar problems want to come together and hence schedule appointments with the same date / information details. A single session can solve both of their problems, which can improve efficiencies significantly. However, this is unfortunately not allowed by the app.

@nus-pe-bot
Copy link

nus-pe-bot commented Nov 15, 2022

Team's Response

While it is possible that two clients want to come together, the app has been geared towards managing individual clients. Managing groups of clients will require additional features.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I do not think this will require additional features. The issue is related to how the parser enforces the checking of dates and locations of appointments and has something to do with the team's design decision. The UG and DG do not state that the app is for individual clients specifically. The team also admits that it is possible that two clients want to come together. Hence, it is a design flaw that is associated with existing features, not something to do with future features.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants