diff --git a/docs/DeveloperGuide.md b/docs/DeveloperGuide.md
index 1e250ff1765..fe8ddeaeda8 100644
--- a/docs/DeveloperGuide.md
+++ b/docs/DeveloperGuide.md
@@ -161,104 +161,6 @@ Classes used by multiple components are in the `seedu.address.commons` package.
This section describes some noteworthy details on how certain features are implemented.
-### \[Proposed\] Undo/redo feature
-
-#### Proposed Implementation
-
-The proposed undo/redo mechanism is facilitated by `VersionedAddressBook`. It extends `AddressBook` with an undo/redo history, stored internally as an `addressBookStateList` and `currentStatePointer`. Additionally, it implements the following operations:
-
-- `VersionedAddressBook#commit()` — Saves the current address book state in its history.
-- `VersionedAddressBook#undo()` — Restores the previous address book state from its history.
-- `VersionedAddressBook#redo()` — Restores a previously undone address book state from its history.
-
-These operations are exposed in the `Model` interface as `Model#commitAddressBook()`, `Model#undoAddressBook()` and `Model#redoAddressBook()` respectively.
-
-Given below is an example usage scenario and how the undo/redo mechanism behaves at each step.
-
-Step 1. The user launches the application for the first time. The `VersionedAddressBook` will be initialized with the initial address book state, and the `currentStatePointer` pointing to that single address book state.
-
-
-
-Step 2. The user executes `delete 5` command to delete the 5th person in the address book. The `delete` command calls `Model#commitAddressBook()`, causing the modified state of the address book after the `delete 5` command executes to be saved in the `addressBookStateList`, and the `currentStatePointer` is shifted to the newly inserted address book state.
-
-
-
-Step 3. The user executes `add n/David …` to add a new person. The `add` command also calls `Model#commitAddressBook()`, causing another modified address book state to be saved into the `addressBookStateList`.
-
-
-
-
-
-**Note:** If a command fails its execution, it will not call `Model#commitAddressBook()`, so the address book state will not be saved into the `addressBookStateList`.
-
-
-
-Step 4. The user now decides that adding the person was a mistake, and decides to undo that action by executing the `undo` command. The `undo` command will call `Model#undoAddressBook()`, which will shift the `currentStatePointer` once to the left, pointing it to the previous address book state, and restores the address book to that state.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-**Note:** If the `currentStatePointer` is at index 0, pointing to the initial AddressBook state, then there are no previous AddressBook states to restore. The `undo` command uses `Model#canUndoAddressBook()` to check if this is the case. If so, it will return an error to the user rather
-than attempting to perform the undo.
-
-
-
-The following sequence diagram shows how an undo operation goes through the `Logic` component:
-
-
-
-
-
-**Note:** The lifeline for `UndoCommand` should end at the destroy marker (X) but due to a limitation of PlantUML, the lifeline reaches the end of diagram.
-
-
-
-Similarly, how an undo operation goes through the `Model` component is shown below:
-
-
-
-The `redo` command does the opposite — it calls `Model#redoAddressBook()`, which shifts the `currentStatePointer` once to the right, pointing to the previously undone state, and restores the address book to that state.
-
-
-
-**Note:** If the `currentStatePointer` is at index `addressBookStateList.size() - 1`, pointing to the latest address book state, then there are no undone AddressBook states to restore. The `redo` command uses `Model#canRedoAddressBook()` to check if this is the case. If so, it will return an error to the user rather than attempting to perform the redo.
-
-
-
-Step 5. The user then decides to execute the command `list`. Commands that do not modify the address book, such as `list`, will usually not call `Model#commitAddressBook()`, `Model#undoAddressBook()` or `Model#redoAddressBook()`. Thus, the `addressBookStateList` remains unchanged.
-
-
-
-Step 6. The user executes `clear`, which calls `Model#commitAddressBook()`. Since the `currentStatePointer` is not pointing at the end of the `addressBookStateList`, all address book states after the `currentStatePointer` will be purged. Reason: It no longer makes sense to redo the `add n/David …` command. This is the behavior that most modern desktop applications follow.
-
-
-
-The following activity diagram summarizes what happens when a user executes a new command:
-
-
-
-#### Design considerations:
-
-**Aspect: How undo & redo executes:**
-
-- **Alternative 1 (current choice):** Saves the entire address book.
-
- - Pros: Easy to implement.
- - Cons: May have performance issues in terms of memory usage.
-
-- **Alternative 2:** Individual command knows how to undo/redo by
- itself.
- - Pros: Will use less memory (e.g. for `delete`, just save the person being deleted).
- - Cons: We must ensure that the implementation of each individual command are correct.
-
-_{more aspects and alternatives to be added}_
-
-### \[Proposed\] Data archiving
-
-_{Explain here how the data archiving feature will be implemented}_
-
---
## **Documentation, logging, testing, configuration, dev-ops**