Missing attributes when paginating customers

[askl-addepto]

Issue summary

When executing function Customers.find() only the first page contains user emails, any customer retrieved from .next_page() is missing important attributes.

Expected behavior

I would expect every customer in all pages contain the same attributes.

Actual behavior

Only the customers on the first page have key attributes like first_name, last_name and email.

Steps to reproduce the problem

1. Execute function Customer.find() on a set of customers larger than the limit.
2. On the result object execute .next_page().
3. Print any customer from the result.

[ScottRoach]

What API version are you using and could you provide some code?

The only difference that I see in the 2023-04 version is the lack of default_address in the first page.

# Get first 2 pages of customers
customers_page1 = shopify.Customer.find(limit=10)
customers_page2 = customers_page1.next_page()

# Get the unique keys for the first customer in those pages
page1_keys = set(customers_page1[0].attributes.keys())
page2_keys = set(customers_page2[0].attributes.keys())

# Show the differences between the 2 sets of keys
print('Page 1 keys not in page 2:', page1_keys.difference(page2_keys))
print('Page 2 keys not in page 1:', page2_keys.difference(page1_keys))

# Results:
# Page 1 keys not in page2: set()
# Page 2 keys not in page 1: {'default_address'}

[ScottRoach]

If you are specifying fields make sure you set them as a string and not an array, because that will exhibit the behavior that you mentioned. Ex:

customers = shopify.Customer.find(fields=['id', 'email']) # Incorrect
customers = shopify.Customer.find(fields='id,email') # Correct

[github-actions]

This issue is stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity. It will be closed if no further action occurs in 14 days.

[github-actions]

We are closing this issue because it has been inactive for a few months.
This probably means that it is not reproducible or it has been fixed in a newer version.
If it’s an enhancement and hasn’t been taken on since it was submitted, then it seems other issues have taken priority.

If you still encounter this issue with the latest stable version, please reopen using the issue template. You can also contribute directly by submitting a pull request– see the CONTRIBUTING.md file for guidelines

Thank you!