-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question about score threshold of Bbox Branch #4
Comments
A1: Except for the NMS for bounding box, we also do NMS for the quadrilaterals outputted by plane clustering. Consequently, in the test stage, the full pipeline is:
note:
A2: Sorry, we haven't done the ablation study on Data Augmentation. But for the modification on anchor, we believe that for the RPN-based methods which need setting the anchor manually, adjusting the anchor for the dataset is always no harm. |
@JingChaoLiu Thanks for your tips 👍 |
Q1: When I set the score threshold to 0.05 as maskrcnn default, the precision was very low. Then I set the score threshold to 0.5, the F-measure matches the proposed score(88.20% on ICDAR 2015 test set), but the recall and the precision do not match the score on paper.
Q2: Have you do the ablation study on Data Augmentation, RPN Anchor and OHEM. In my experiments, Data Augmentation and OHEM improve the performance, but modification for RPN Anchor does not work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: