Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the Conda-Forge package production-ready #418

Open
1 of 3 tasks
Zeitsperre opened this issue Jan 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Make the Conda-Forge package production-ready #418

Zeitsperre opened this issue Jan 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Zeitsperre
Copy link
Contributor

Zeitsperre commented Jan 5, 2022

Raven-WPS is now on conda-forge (https://github.com/conda-forge/raven-wps-feedstock), but this package is very beta, alpha even. There are a number of issues that need to be addressed:

  • Flesh out the CLI - Given that we rely on the Makefile for deployment, we need to integrate some Runtime configurations into the CLI of the tool (we should be doing this anyway). We should be able to Raven-WPS from the command-line, asking that users provide a configuration file when called if they don't want the default run configuration.
  • Renaming Raven-WPS - There's also the issue of the shared utility name between Raven-WPS and Raven-Hydro. On the command line, the raven-wps package is called using $ raven-wps, whereas raven-hydro uses $ raven. We should update our documentation and deployments to use the new name when we're ready.
  • Fixing GDAL - There's always the annoyances from GDAL: As it stands, I've hard-coded Raven-WPS to use conda-forge-provided gdal ==3.4.0. There are two means of fixing this:
@Zeitsperre Zeitsperre added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 5, 2022
@Zeitsperre Zeitsperre self-assigned this Jan 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant