You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The map legend suggests that lines with third rail electrification should be outlined with gray (#797979) highlighting but this has not been done.
I took a look at this today and have a few ideas, but I think replicating that degree of thickness (50% wider on each side than the actual line) as suggested by the legend would look bad. Also do we want to have third rail highlighting on lines that also have overhead electrification (quite a bit around New York Penn Station and more on the way)? Right now, dual electrification segments are grayed out but that's a different issue.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I did a quick mock up and test in kosmtik by modifying the electrification.mss file by replicating and modifying the global zoom>=9 casing code. Not sure how we should handle zoom < 9 electrification-diff.txt
Well should I open a bug under OpenRailwayMap/OpenRailwayMap (I think that's where the legend is stored) to update the legend or should I continue working on implementing this? I can make it happen, just have some "artistic" questions.
The map legend suggests that lines with third rail electrification should be outlined with gray (#797979) highlighting but this has not been done.
I took a look at this today and have a few ideas, but I think replicating that degree of thickness (50% wider on each side than the actual line) as suggested by the legend would look bad. Also do we want to have third rail highlighting on lines that also have overhead electrification (quite a bit around New York Penn Station and more on the way)? Right now, dual electrification segments are grayed out but that's a different issue.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: