Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UX: reorganise configurations #26

Open
victor-champonnois opened this issue Oct 6, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #140
Open

UX: reorganise configurations #26

victor-champonnois opened this issue Oct 6, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #140
Labels
enhancement no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue.

Comments

@victor-champonnois
Copy link
Member

submitted by @robinkeunen

@enricostano coopdevs had some ideas about this.

  • move the configurations on the company views to a specific "cooperator" menu in res.config.setting (general parameters).
  • add access to this new view from the Cooperator / Configuration menu
@enricostano
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, would be nice to discuss this.

@github-actions
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Apr 30, 2023
@robinkeunen robinkeunen added no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. and removed stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. labels May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants