Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 with "jet tuning" #586

Open
PeterHjortLauritzen opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 with "jet tuning" #586

PeterHjortLauritzen opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation

Comments

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link

Purpose of the run

In coupled run 104 we have positive biases in both the NH and SH Polar night jets. @JulioTBacmeister recommended the following tuning:

effgw_rdg_beta		= 1.0D0 (from 0.5D0)
effgw_rdg_beta_max	= 1.0D0 (from 0.5D0)
alpha_gw_movmtn		= 0.02d0 (from 0.01d0) 

We don't have a FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 (baseline) but I think @tilmes will run that ...

Description of the run

See purpose of the run

Suffix in the casename

Suffix

Namelist modifications

effgw_rdg_beta = 1.0D0
effgw_rdg_beta_max = 1.0D0
alpha_gw_movmtn = 0.02d0

Source modifications

SourceMods

Sandbox

Requested sandbox or tag

Contact info

@JulioTBacmeister @cecilehannay @adamrher @tilmes

Any other relevant information

Enter relevant info

@PeterHjortLauritzen PeterHjortLauritzen added the Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation label Sep 23, 2024
@tilmes
Copy link

tilmes commented Sep 24, 2024

@PeterHjortLauritzen do you want me to setup this run? f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104 with the tuning as described?

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link
Author

That would be great. Thanks!

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

cecilehannay commented Sep 24, 2024

@JulioTBacmeister @PeterHjortLauritzen @adamrher @tilmes:
Do we want also a FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 WITHOUT the "jet tuning ?

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

Re-reading the instructions, I see that it said that Simone is going to run the FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 WITHOUT the "jet tuning ? Is it correct @tilmes?

PS: I could do both or one. I just need to clarify.

@tilmes
Copy link

tilmes commented Sep 24, 2024

Yes, I can start both once, from 1995-2014 if that is fine!

@tilmes
Copy link

tilmes commented Sep 27, 2024

I have two runs for 12 years: 1995-2007:
Without the jet tuning:
Case: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104
Output: /glade/derecho/scratch/tilmes/archive/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104/atm/hist

with jet tuning:
Case: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning
Output: /glade/derecho/scratch/tilmes/archive/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning

@islasimpson could you redo the diagnostics with those?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants