Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorting comparison between 2.5 and 4 #634

Closed
PadmasolaGuru opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Sorting comparison between 2.5 and 4 #634

PadmasolaGuru opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@PadmasolaGuru
Copy link

Describe the issue:

HI, I used Kilosort 2.5 for sorting out data recorded from Neuropixel 1.0 probe. After the release of Kilosort 4, I tried to run KS4 on the same data and compared the sorting quality. It seems that KS4 sorted quite large number of spikes compared to KS2.5. Although the number of Good and MUA clusters are fairly equal between both, but the number of total number spikes in Good clusters is atleast 50% less in KS4 compared to KS2.5. May I know if this is something we need to be concerned of. Attached is the image of comparison between KS2.5 and KS4.
KS comparison

@marius10p
Copy link
Contributor

This will depend on your particular experimental prep, probe geometry, thresholds etc. What you can do is load them side by side in Phy and see if the extra good clusters in KS2.5 are actually good or not, and which units are not found in Kilosort4. With that information, you may be able to figure out what parameters to adjust if any (drift correction etc). We'll make a guide for evaluating and fixing problems, when we have time.

@jacobpennington
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this for now, related to #642. If you have additional questions please let us know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants