New version of the 3D Printer board #3
Comments
|
Hey. |
|
1/16 step...oups, and 12V on stepper only not 24v...double oups... |
|
Neoolog , please explain why? I see this all the time, and nobody has a good reason why we need more than 1/16 microstepping, or to be able to run on voltages higher than 12. It simply isnt true. |
|
Higher voltage allows faster heating as with higher voltage you can send more energy trough wires of the same thickness. If you want to heat your bed fast you would need really thick wires with 12V. With 24V you get double the energy through the same wires. More then 1/16 stepping helps with stepper noise reduction. 1/16 is currently used on printers. This thread asks for feature for the next generation board. More precise stepping might come in handy for some new designs. |
|
@JustAnother1 Sorry, you did not read the question. I understand the benefit of higher voltage for the heaters. The reply was about the motors. :) I know the answers to my questions, but everybody always argues for higher motor voltage and microstepping with no valid information to back up why. they just think higher is better , which is not true. There is not much of a benefit to running the motors of the type of machines this will be used on at higher than 12V , and can actually have a negative impact since the board does not have phase output diodes. I disagree abut 1/16 microstepping too. This is a common misconception. Higher microstepping DOES NOT = greater precision. Nor does it necessarily translate to quieter operation. Noisy operation usually comes from motor mismatch to the driver, and resonant coupling to the machine frame. Microstepping can be a band aid to this problem , but not the solution, and if the machine was designed properly in the first place , it would not be an issue. @St3dPrinter Please refrain from taking technical advice from the RepRap community. Yes, its a great community , and there is a lot of knowledge within it , but almost nobody understands the technical aspects of driving stepper motors properly. Also, I would like to see output diodes on the motor phases. This will improve microstepping performance even at 1/16 step. |
|
@EFlynn7778 I might again be misunderstanding what you are saying, but I don't see the " valid information to back up" your points in your reply. @St3dPrinter I think what he wanted to say is that you should not blindly implement every feature that someone requests. As that would result in a lot of features that will be of no use. I agree with EFlynn7778 that there is much knowledge in the RepRap community. If you base your decision on the valid arguments brought forward by those competent members, and ignore the rest, you should be fine. Regarding stepper motor voltage and micro stepping. I think one can only discuss this with also looking at the stepper controller chips. Then it also depends on what kind of stepper you are intending to use. There are not only PrusaI3's out there. Some people build really big printers and therefore the requirements regarding the stepper parameters might not be the same for everybody. @EFlynn7778 You might want to take a look at http://www.trinamic.com/products/integrated-circuits/details/tmc260a-pa/ Regarding noise: Part of the reason for too much noise from the stepper is also the firmware. Marlin for example has this feature of doing up to 4 steps in one ISR. This means that the timing of the steps is completely wrong. As some time later the next group of 4 steps will be made. I agree that it is better to fix the problem then to compensate for the consequences. But sometimes that is not possible, or not the best way to do it. So silent steps are not the killer feature that everybody must have. But if it comes with the stepper chips you use anyway than that is a plus. |
|
Thank you for these informations. They are realy usefull. |
|
@JustAnother1 I am not saying there arent applications that require higher voltages and microstepping. However , the vast majority of machines this controller will be used on, will fit well within the 12v, 1/16th step spec. Microstepping is intended to be used to account for various mechanical advantages/disadvantages. NOT to make your machine run quieter. NOT to make it more precise. Finer microstepping does not necessarily equal more precise movement, and in the case of the RepRap community , higher voltage/microstepping is most often used as a bandaid to poor machine design rather than from genuine necessity. ST isnt building a Ramps board here , but rather a nice controller that should be paired with nice hardware that is properly designed and doesnt require a bunch of nonsense band-aiding. If you want a machine equivalent to the Ramps , then fine, continue building poorly designed Prusa's that require poor stepper driving decisions to be made in order for them to operate satisfactorily. Also remember, steppers are current devices , not voltage , meaning it is current applied to the windings , not voltage , that provides torque. Do you think that just because you are supplying say 40V to a stepper driver , that is what is being applied to the phase windings? You would be incorrect. Ohms law still applies here. Look at some motor spec sheets and figure out based on winding specs, what voltage would be applied to the motor phases to provide full holding torque. Some basic ( in now way complete/definitive) info that may help you understand better https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepper_motor |
|
@EFlynn7778 I think it is very sad that you don't share your wisdom with us. Just claiming that other statements are false doesn't help here. (I know Owns Law) I also don't understand your reasoning. You argue that there is a use case for Higher Voltages
You then argue that the ST board is not intended for only normal use (like ramps on those 12V machines):
So I agree with you that this board should not focus only the machines that
I think you also made clear that you don't need more than 12V and 1/16 micro stepping. Problem is:
12V and 1/16 micro step is already covert in the current version. So just use that or start listing the features that you want. |
|
Just leave the choice to user....if some body is happy with 12v and 16 step...Goood im happy to. but leave the possibility to other people to do what they want to do with the board and very body will be happy....ohms law or not.... |
|
EE here. Please support 24V operation so the steppers can be run at a higher top speed. |
|
EE here as well, and I'm not trying to create arguments, but you simply
stating 24v to support higher top speed is not a very accurate statement.
Higher voltage does not necessarily equal higher speed.
…On Jan 7, 2017 11:33 AM, "dtt0213" ***@***.***> wrote:
EE here. Please support 24V operation so the steppers can be run at a
higher top speed.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWdHbxh20xqXkpEdqOWQNhBqDW4xsjIpks5rP75VgaJpZM4KSSw4>
.
|
|
Please argue with this: V/L = di/dt where: di/dt represents motor speed. You increase it by either increasing voltage or reducing inductance |
|
Not arguing with that at all, but please read some datasheets for typical
motors, and drivers used on these machines. Its not as straight forward as
that.
…On Jan 7, 2017 12:47 PM, "dtt0213" ***@***.***> wrote:
Please argue with this:
V/L = di/dt
where:
V = voltage
L = inductance
di/dt = change in current
di/dt represents motor speed. You increase it by either increasing voltage
or reducing inductance
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWdHb4V6NqfJMtjqQLTz66zZsXI3YlYlks5rP8_BgaJpZM4KSSw4>
.
|
|
@St3dPrinter +1 for adding software to read from a USB memory stick Please also consider supporting a TFT with 4.3" touchscreen similar to your STM32F7 disco board. At least add a 40 pin TFT connector. These additions would make the demo feature set similar to that of the Ultimaker 3 which is based on a much more complicated embedded controller + Linux system. This would make the ST solution a clear differentiator. |
|
@dtt0213 Do you have details on the Ultiaker3 Schematic (Linux System) ? I only found the Board with the two AVRs,.. |
|
I just read about the Ultimaker 3 electronics architecture here: https://ultimaker.com/en/community/23401-inside-the-ultimaker-3-day-4-electronics |
|
@dtt0213 thanks for the link. I like the Ultimaker design. Therefore this suggestion for a new board: A board without processor that can be connected to a Nucleo would be nice. The Nucleo could then be connected (using UART) to a RaspberryPi/BeagleBone/... Stuff like USB Stick Support, Display, Wifi, Ethernet come for free with the Raspberry. The board would just be a RAMPS for Nucleo and could therefore be really cheap. With the Nucleos much cheaper than Arduino2560 this would be a great fit for the low end printers. So better performance for less money! |
|
@St3dPrinter Summary and some more additions:
See this vid on a printer that has a nice UI. It also uses an ST chip!
I believe all of these features could be added using an STM32F7 chip. Please offer a board/design that is a substantial differentiator from what's out there otherwise it won't gain much traction. |
|
Hi,
|
|
KEEP IT SIMPLE....stay with a simple board, dont put UI interface on it, just give the possibility to plug a other board ( user choice) for the UI...Some need display inteface and some not, so the price will increase to much for those who not need inboard UI....KEEP IT SIMPLE If some chip on the big board broke you lost everithing and need to put big dollard on the table for restart the machine.....KEEP IT SIMPLE If you modify to much the board it will take long time the produce ......KEEP IT SIMPLE The firmware will be to big and complex to debug.......KEEP IT SIMPLE Think MODULAR interface, so the people buy and put what they need for the own machine so the price still low......KEEP IT SIMPLE I dont want to pay for another processor and sdram and display adaptor and camera interface, i got 3 Raspberry and display here for my printer and they do their job......KEEP IT SIMPLE GIVE the USER the CHOICE they need for them, dont force them to have YOUR DREAM BOARD, no body have the same dream.....KEEP IT SIMPLE |
|
@Neoolog |
|
Hi,
Same features as v1 for printing part:
|
|
I would allow for some "unused" interfaces. So that other stuff can easily be added (Bed Level Sensor, Filament Sensor, RGB LED strip, Flux capacitor,..) |
|
It's my mistake. I forget to indicate in the picture the different sensors used for bed leveling (induction, BLTouch or simple switch), temperature sensor,.... |
|
@St3dPrinter When you say the full featured system is "expensive" it may not be compared to a comparable system built on more expensive components like the Ultimaker 3 design. From a marketing stand point there are already many low cost designs based on AVR micros flooding the market. I think there is a void in the higher end boards that the STM32F4 or STM32F7 designs could fill. BTW - the high end board should be < $100. Think of an STM32F7-DISCO eval board with stepper drivers added. Camera, TFT, Wifi, etc could be accessory items. |
|
@dtt0213 I agree with you on USB Host. But I disagree on "low cost" vs "expensive". Did you see that the current board is at 135€ ? You are right that there is a lot of competition on low cost solutions. You basically can get everything cheaper from china. And they also start doing their own AVR based boards. But even the simple and cheap solution suggested above will have a ARM Cortex-M CPU. So this is not lowest quality. This does not need to be cheaper than what is currently available. One of my printer setups is this: A Arduino2560 with a RAMPS 1.4 http://reprap.org/wiki/RAMPS_1.4 connected to a RaspberryPi3 with the Raspi Display (7" touch). On the software side it runs a firmware on AVR and Octoprint on the Pi. With Octoscreen https://github.com/chickenchuck040/octoscreen to have a touch friendly UI. Ramps 1.4, Pololu(4x), Arduino Mega 25560: 40€ Total: 175€ I think that that setup has all the features you want (Ethernet, USB Host, Wifi, TFT, Touch, Camera,..) The high end board you seek should probably have all this but for less money, right? I can understand Ultimaker in that they don't want to implement drivers on a Cortex-M for all this stuff. On my example setup replacing the Arduino 2560 with a Nucleo or Discovery board could save some money and also give better performance. The problem is that both boards don't have the Arduino 2560 connectors. All that is needed would be a checkup of the Ramps Schematic to make it 3.3V and a layout that matches the Nucleo pinout. If then the Chinese copy that board and sell it even cheaper that is probably no problem for ST. And with AVR is started the same way, as the obvious next step it so put the ST chip directly on a new board. That is how all those AVR based printer boards were created. But for the community to adopt the Nucleos and therefore the ST ARM chips such a Ramps-ST would be needed. And I think that ST basically wouldn't care if people buy their boards or if all the Chinese boards will use ST chips instead of the (compared to performance) pricey Microchip(previously Atmel) AVR. I think this would be a small thing for ST to do with a potential huge benefit. And nobody says that they can not also build that "expensive sub 100$" board you dream of. @St3dPrinter One more thing: You might want to think about powering the SBC(Raspi/BBB/or whatever( from the printerbord. (The Raspi can be powered by supplying 5V to the GPIO Pins) This would allow the user to only have on big power supply that powers everything from motors to heaters to the SBC. That also solves common GND problems,... But that all is just my 2c and my humble opinion. So do whatever you think is best. |
|
I'm taking the OEM perspective- a low cost and integrated design for a full featured capable system. ST does not need to include an LCD, camera, or Wifi on the base kit. They just need to provide headers for these peripherals for future expansion. I spent the last 2 years designing boards with the STM32F4 and STM32F7 micros with LCD and USB host interface. These are powerful chips. The board I"m talking about can be made for < $100. The STM32F7-DISCO eval board has half of what we need for $50. Spend another $50 for the 3D printer hardware and future expansions. |
|
Internally we had also think about a third way that will be a Nucleo expension board, as you suggested.
|
|
@St3dPrinter I just received the "Microcontroller news from STMicroelectronics January 2017" email advertisement. And for the second time they mention the "Arduino STAR OTTO board" When can I buy it and where? The linked Arduino shop seems to not have it,... The STar Otto would also be a good option as base for the "new expansion board",... |
|
Hi all. Please help. |
|
Hi, The SD card is needed in the firmware version you are trying. It contains the configuration file. But I agree that it is not a good solution to use a SD card. I will make my possible to push this new branch on GitHub for tomorrow evening. |
|
@JustAnother1 I will try to get a status regarding the OTTO board. @Janusz-M I just pushed the new version of the firmware. You can try it. |
|
Now I can control the Board with the STEVAL-3D001V1. Whether the LCD display will work? He is big and graphic. |
|
Have already have a M999 with another board. ..it was my temp sensor not working ... |
|
@Janusz-M Do you have technical information of your LCD display? Is it a I2C display? |
|
@St3dPrinter It looks like all the documentation for the LCD display Janusz-M asked about is available here: "http://reprap.org/wiki/RepRapDiscount_Full_Graphic_Smart_Controller#Schematics". Is there any decisions or projected time frame for a new design from ST? I am a little late to this party but found the STEVAL-3DP001V1 board and have been debating getting one and working to see what I could do with the firmware. Although I do already have several discovery and Nucleo boards, so if it will not be long for a new design I might wait. The one main feature I would like to see added is the ability to add atleast a minimal display and rotary encoder for a direct interface to the board, similiar to What Janusz-M linked, better would be an option for a LCD with touch screen. Thank you to ST for their interest and looking at what the community wants! Edited to fix the link.... |
|
It's well accepted in the industry that higher voltage gives better stepper performance. In terms of heaters, higher voltages = less current = less I2R losses (aka heat) A 24v 5a heater is much easier to deal with than an equivalent power 12v 10a heater. Smaller wires, more common connectors, smaller PCB traces, smaller MOSFETS, less heatsinking. Google how many DIY printers have fried due to overheated wires and connectors. from oreintalmotor dot com website. They make motors...they should know. :-) |
|
Would this work on a regular ST32 dev board like a Nucleo? The STEVAL-3DP001V1 is an impressive board but overkill for my needs. |
|
I m really looking for a solution to drive the Ramps board with the powerfull f7 disco board but reading the comment here it look like the board is not Ramps compatible rights ? I agree with justanother1 USB/wifi touch screen and fast cpu are mandatory. It will be great if st will make Shields to use the existing board like f7 disco who already have all Logic and graphic to drive à 3D printer just put all the motors drivers and extrudeur on the Shields so if something burn you can change it instead of Trash a 150€ single board |
|
So firstly yes more voltage is better when driving a stepper motor its got to do with the slew rate and how fast your stepping the motors. The faster you step or pulse the motors the higher the voltage needs to be. if the voltage is to low when increasing speed you will lose steps this is because of the voltage rolling off to quickly by the time the pulse has turned off the out put voltage gets clipped and you don't have enough voltage/current to drive the coils.. When you increase the voltage when you pulse the stepper at a high frequency the voltage will rise quicker and will not get clipped as voltage is increased its rise time is decreased . Think voltage as pressure the more pressure you have the faster you can actuate a pneumatic cylinder.. these chips you buy to control a stepper are chopper circuits.. the current is measured on the h-bridge so that the power source is turned off if current gets to high.. also if you to gain something there are always losses if you increase the steps to 1/16 or any other increase you will loose torque... and yes the lower the steps per rev the noisier the unit gets and will also vibrate the 3d printer witch would not be good.... |
The objective of the thread is to list all features you want to have in the new 3D printer controler board.
Describe the feature and why you need it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: